Posted by Joseph Knippenberg
More civil, more orderly, more deliberative? Who could have predicted that? Certainly not those who voted against him!
Even those who voted against Roberts confirmation seemed to be dazzled by his intelligence, depth of preparation, and charm. So I dont understand this post, especially since Greenhouse observes that Justice OConnors absence may help account for the change.
It seems to me that many accused Roberts of being a narrow, aggressive partisan. Narrow, aggressive partisans dont encourage deliberation, but rather ram their views through. Roberts, CJ, doesnt fit the caricature his opponents painted of him.
We must have been listening to different people. I admit I tend to ignore extreme partisans. In this case, calling attention to them probably doesnt well represent the dominant spirit of the debate over the Roberts nomination.
After your first comment, I went back to statements made by Democratic members of the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Also, if you dont pay attention to extreme partisans, does that mean that you pay attention only to those Democrats who, say, voted for the confirmation of Roberts? If so, then you cant pay attention to the leadership of the Democratic Party or to its likely 2008 presidential contenders.
However conducive to sanity such a strategy may be, it doesnt enable one to understand much about the current character of the Democratic Party.
Thanks for the instruction. We all have our extremists to bear.
Ashbrook Center at Ashland University | 401 College Avenue | Ashland, Ohio 44805 | (419) 289-5411 | (877) 289-5411 (Toll Free)