Strengthening Constitutional Self-Government

No Left Turns

A successful red state Republican

I had the pleasure yesterday of hosting Georgia Republican Congressman Tom Price on campus. (He happens to be my Congressman, now that my neighborhood has been drawn out of Georgia’s 4th District, which for many years returned Cynthia McKinney to Congress.)

Price, in case you don’t know, is one of five prominent medical professionals in Georgia politics (he’s an orthopedic surgeon; Phil Gingrey is an OB-GYN; John Linder and Charlie Norwood are dentists; and Sonny Perdue is a veterinarian). I’m almost ready to tell my students interested in politics to major in biology.

But seriously folks....

What I found most interesting about his presentation was a subtle distancing from the Bush Administration. There was no overt criticism: the closest he came was in referring briefly to a smarter way of waging the war on terror. His three big domestic issues were energy independence, immigration reform, and health care.

On immigration, he’s a "secure border first" guy, but he couches his position in a way I hadn’t heard before. Of course, he’s realistic about the needs of our economy, but he’s also realistic about the needs of our polity. We must, he argued, engage and enfranchise those within our borders to make certain that they understand what it means to be an American. Our current arrangements might be economically tolerable (my words, not his), but they’re not civically tolerable (my interpretation of his words). "Hear, hear!" I say (if I heard and understood him correctly).

He also spoke at some length about partisanship in Washington, D.C., which he contrasted unfavorably to his experience in the Georgia state legislature (where he served eight years, the last two as the first Republican majority leader in the state senate since Reconstruction). The best day in D.C. is like the worst day in Atlanta, from the standpoint of partisanship.

He offered two explanations for this phenomenon: the way districts are drawn facilitates partisan extremism; and the fact that Congress has essentially a Tuesday - Thursday workweek, which keeps informal social contact among members to an absolute minimum. I’m only somewhat persuaded by the first explanation. He’s surely right that safe districts reduce the need to reach across party lines to find votes, but there is the question of character. He strikes me as a sensible guy, hardly a fire-breathing partisan, yet he represents an exceedingly safe Republican district. The other point deserves more consideration than I have time for right now, but it also gets to the issue of character and civility.

Don’t we, in the end, get the representatives we deserve? (If so, I must be doing something right.)

Discussions - 2 Comments

As a former advocate working at the Georgia capitol, I find Price’s assertion hard to believe. As far as I could tell when I was working the gold dome between 2000-2003, the enmity between the two parties was very strong, with the Democrats happily using the majority to squelch the GOP and joyfully using redistricting (ultimately unsuccessfully) to keep power in their hands.

Hunter,

I report, you decide. That’s pretty much what he said. If he’s right, things must be horrific in D.C.

Leave a Comment

* denotes a required field
 

No TrackBacks
TrackBack URL: http://nlt.ashbrook.org/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/8068