Posted by Peter W. Schramm
Here is the Washington Post story on Friday. Note that all the Democratic presidential hopefuls voted in favor, and the only Democrat Senator in a tough race this fall to vote against is Minnesota’s Paul Wellstone. This is the text of the resolution.
The short of it is that Bush has shaped the international debate in exactly the way he has wanted. He will now get a very strong U.N. resolution that will mean that he will also have a coalition. And, most important, we might get our way without crying havoc and let slip the dogs of war. This is impressive, even if some of his opponents think (still!) that it has been haphazardly done. In other words some think all this is an accident. This is no accident. This is the kind of design that both Aristotle and Machiavelli (never mind Sun Tzu) would agree is prudent. Besides, it is not true that virtue has no friends. This news story makes clear that this resolution is much better and stronger than the one his father got twelve years ago. The story in USA Today makes clear, in short form, how the White House did this.
4:15 PM / October 11, 2002
Posted by Peter W. Schramm
Robert Alt makes a modest proposal, not lacking in wit, on why Giuliani should run for the Senate in New Jersey, and do it now, not in six years. It’s perfectly OK since Forrester is behind in the polls! Must read.
2:39 PM / October 10, 2002
Posted by Peter W. Schramm
It looks more and more as if the French tanker off the coast of Yemen was hit by terrorists. Mark Steyn asks Europeans to spend more on the military. He is not an optimist. Paul Marshall reflects on our new (and better) relationship with some West African countries, and hopes that Nigeria doesn’t become the next hotbed in Islamic radicalism. And this interview with Jeffrey Goldberg is interesting. He claims that Hezbollah is more dangerous than al Queda.
1:48 PM / October 10, 2002
Posted in Elections by Peter W. Schramm
Mark Steyn on the Demos unraveling. Very funny. And
Democratic Senator Zell Miller writes this thoughtful piece showing that the Democratic Party is re-playing the 1970's. How come this guy is still a Democrat?
David Broder adds his two cents on the the Democratic Party's malaise and why they are unable to give the public any idea of where they stand on pressing issues of the day and what it has to do with their Vietnam memories. Noemie Emery explains why
Bush drives the Democrats crazy.
10:12 AM / October 10, 2002
3:40 PM / October 9, 2002
Posted in Journalism by Peter W. Schramm
Dick Morris slams The New York Times for the recent push-poll they conducted and why it was slanted.
1:41 PM / October 9, 2002
Posted in Foreign Affairs by Peter W. Schramm
This is
a clear article from Arab News explaining the support we are getting from Arab countries, some of it public, some private, most of it duplicitous, all of it useful, and hardly reported in our press.
12:47 PM / October 9, 2002
Posted in Foreign Affairs by Peter W. Schramm
This is an
article about a letter that a father of a suicide bomber sent to the London-based Arabic language daily
Al-Hayat. Note the courage of the last paragraph, especially.
8:32 AM / October 9, 2002
Posted in Foreign Affairs by Peter W. Schramm
The President gave a fine speech in Cincinnati on Monday night. He is doing the right thing and, as far as I can tell, the right way. It is important that he continue to act like a cowboy: his threat of invasion has to be taken seriously by the bad guys. If it is taken seriously, there is a chance that there will be no war because Iraq will disarm. The Congress will vote this week and I predict that about seventy percent (at a minimum) of the Senators and Congressmen will approve the resolution. Then things will break wide open at the U.N. Here is
Bush's speech.
John Podhoretz reflects on the President's excellent speech in Cincinnati, and why the major networks didn't cover it.
10:42 AM / October 8, 2002
Posted in Foreign Affairs by Peter W. Schramm
Here is
Tim Russert's conversation with Daschle last Sunday. Russert pressed him on the differences between the 1998 resolution (which Daschle supported) and the current one and found the Senator to be babbling. Well done, Russert!
9:55 AM / October 8, 2002
Posted in Courts by Peter W. Schramm
If you want a perfectly clear (and shocking) explanation and interpretation of the New Jersey Supreme Court ruling on the Torricelli case,
see this great Robert Alt piece. And George Will argues persuasively that the
Democratic Party should be punished nationally for this travesty.
8:13 AM / October 8, 2002