I just read the WaPo article that Hayward notes below. This is amazing. To be so public in revealing that all you are interested in is promoting agenda x,y, or z, rather than the Constitution can only mean that he didn’t think any mischief would follow. Stevens is assuming that since everyone has known this for years, he’s just making something public that everyone (or, at least certain Justices) has known in private. Well, I think mischief should follow. Don’t these guys take an oath to uphold the Constitution? Imposing their will on the public? Will the public take this lying down? Does the Constitution have no friends?