Strengthening Constitutional Self-Government

No Left Turns

Barone on California’s Primary and the Dems Dimming Hopes

Michael Barone had a great post yesterday analyzing the results of California’s primary election of last week. What those outside of California probably don’t realize is that California had two propositions (you know, those crazy relics of the Progressive era that have attempted to re-introduce direct democracy and made our state legislature even more unaccountable for their actions--but I digress) that went down to defeat. They were huge defeats for liberal Democrats. The first would have created universal preschool for all 4 year-olds by placing a special tax on individuals making over $400 K and couples making over $800 K. The second was a bond measure for public libraries. These are issues that warm the hearts of most liberals and, because the Democrats had a primary for Governor, more Democrats showed up for this election than Republicans. Early polls in the election season showed the first initiative way ahead. But both propositions were soundly defeated. Why?

Could it be that people--even your average liberals--are becoming skeptical about the ability of government to run programs like these? Phil Angelides, the liberal Democrat who won the primary (barely) against former E-Bay executive Steve Westly probably sealed the deal for Arnold in November. Westly’s ads attacked Angelides for his liberal spending and taxing--but made a case for his own environmentalist bonafides. Granted, Westly had big dollars to wage his fight against Angelides, but he almost pulled it off and that’s significant.

Barone argues that:

Liberal Democrats like to believe that government programs can improve people’s lives and that it’s a good idea to redistribute through taxes money from the rich to the presumably less well off. But in practice the redistribution they support turns out to be from the pockets of taxpayers generally to public employee unions and thence to the Democratic Party. In California this has been facilitated because a lot of affluent people in the Los Angeles and San Francisco metro areas are happy to vote for Democrats because of their liberal stands on lifestyle issues like abortion and because they are so well off that they don’t mind paying more in taxes.

In other words, many of our metropolitain liberals don’t mind paying higher taxes for these stupid programs because they are already so rich they don’t feel it and they don’t have to use the public facilities (like schools) anyway. They cheerfully pay the taxes for us peasants so that they can get support for their pet social issues. He might also have added that by paying these taxes such liberals also buy their way out of actually having to think about solutions to social problems that might work--like hearkening back to social norms that encourage hard work, industry, and public morality (and thereby cut against their pet social issues). But I digress again . . .

Discussions - 4 Comments

So, we tax the rich (yet again) so that parents don’t have to raise their kids?

Let’s remember that the wealthier one is, the more practical opportunities exist to avoid taxes. Think home ownership for the modestly wealthy, annuities for the somewhat wealthy, trust funds for the fully wealthy, and foundations for the eye-poppingly wealthy.

Legislators always seem to write a few loopholes into tax laws, and that’s one of the reason many of the ’rich’ don’t object as much as might be expected.

Your use of the phrase "pet issues" reminds me of the many recent studies showing the great divide between the fertility rates of Conservatives and Liberals; most of the Liberals pushing for these issues have little to no vested interest in seeing any empirical success (ie they’re childless or maybe one designer baby).

Reaganomics 101:

The Governator ran on a promise he’d do whatever is necessary to get big businesses, which have fled California over the past several years, to return. Taxing the "rich" drove the businesses out of CA in the first place. They’re not going to come back, and more are going to leave, if the refrain is "come to CA so we can tax you even more than before for the benefit of teachers’ unions and the democrat party."

I think even dems are starting to get that...well some of them anyway.

Leave a Comment

* denotes a required field

No TrackBacks
TrackBack URL:

Warning: include(/srv/users/prod-php-nltashbrook/apps/prod-php-nltashbrook/public/sd/nlt-blog/_includes/promo-main.php): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /srv/users/prod-php-nltashbrook/apps/prod-php-nltashbrook/public/2006/06/barone-on-californias-primary-and-the-dems-dimming-hopes.php on line 493

Warning: include(): Failed opening '/srv/users/prod-php-nltashbrook/apps/prod-php-nltashbrook/public/sd/nlt-blog/_includes/promo-main.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/opt/sp/php7.2/lib/php') in /srv/users/prod-php-nltashbrook/apps/prod-php-nltashbrook/public/2006/06/barone-on-californias-primary-and-the-dems-dimming-hopes.php on line 493