Obama’s decision to keep Gates on, combined with his other national security appointments, is change that conservative bloggers can believe in. How is Gates a change? It’s something new that a president stick with his predecessor’s guy in defense. Lieberman, who’s been treated with impressively calcualated maganimity, is gushing (not in this linked article) that Obama has been about perfect so far. I wouldn’t go that far, but I have to admit I would go pretty far.
On Gates, there's ">">https://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/flyontnewall/2008/11/the-standard-critique-of-the.php"> this.
Stee, That, of course, makes sense. And all we can reasonably expect is competent change.
I suppose his near perfection would not include pending executive orders on expanding funding for stem cell research and restricting energy exploration??