Progressivism
The fact is this president has been so respectful of the Republicans in Congress. He has given them every opportunity for the executive and the legislative branch to work together, to have a solution that has bipartisan support. He's been criticized by some for taking the time that it takes to find out that they're never going to give him a break, which is a compromise
Section 1. We the people who ordain and establish this Constitution intend the rights protected by this Constitution to be the rights of natural persons.
Section 2. People, person, or persons as used in this Constitution does not include corporations, limited liability companies or other corporate entities established by the laws of any state, the United States, or any foreign state, and such corporate entities are subject to such regulation as the people, through their elected state and federal representatives, deem reasonable and are otherwise consistent with the powers of Congress and the States under this Constitution.
Section 3. Nothing contained herein shall be construed to limit the people's rights of freedom of speech, freedom of the press, free exercise of religion, and such other rights of the people, which rights are inalienable.
So just as Congress could therefore ban the speech of nonmedia business corporations, it could ban publications by corporate-run newspapers and magazines -- which I think includes nearly all such newspapers and magazines in the country. ...
Congress could also ban the speech and religious practice of most churches, which are generally organized as corporation. It could ban the speech of nonprofit organizations that are organized as corporations. (Congressman McGovern confirms this: "My 'People's Rights Amendment' is simple and straightforward. It would make clear that all corporate entities -- for-profit and non-profit alike -- are not people with constitutional rights. It treats all corporations, including incorporated unions and non-profits, in the same way: as artificial creatures of the state that we the people govern, not the other way around.") Congress could ban speech about elections and any other speech, whether about religion, politics, or anything else. It could also ban speech in viewpoint-based ways.
If Nancy Pelosi would quit or if we could even imagine the slight possiblity of her being voted out of office the approval rating in Congress would probably go up 50%.
This only reinforces the obvious conclusion that the Left is deeply authoritarian. They worship power, period. And what lets them get away with this is the profound immaturity of most people, who spend their lives looking for someone else to take care of them.
The longer I live, the more I am forced to conclude that the solution to our problems lies in culture rather than politics or economics. Oh sure, some economic reforms can help, and political structure is deeply important, but none of this "sticks" if the fabric of culture is rotten.
Can anybody say Fairness Doctrine?? Bye-bye talk radio and Fox news.
I've been hearing warnings about that one forever now. I wonder what Obama and his Marxist Thug Mob (how am I doing?) are waiting for?