Strengthening Constitutional Self-Government

No Left Turns

Dobson endorses Huckabee: too little, too late

Rather late, don’t you think? Such an endorsement could have helped Huck raise some money earlier on, or perhaps bolstered him in South Carolina, where every little bit would have helped. Had Dobson spoken, say, after Iowa, it’s not clear that McCain would now be the presumptive nominee and that it would now be hard to find a plausible political rationale for Huckabee’s persistence. I’m far from saying--in this counterfactual fantasy--that, but for Dobson’s silence, Huckabee would now be closing in on the nomination. But consider this: Huckabee wins Iowa; McCain wins New Hampshire; and Huckabee wins South Carolina. Who then wins Florida? Wouldn’t it have been a three-way or even four-way race, with Huckabee having the money to persist, McCain not doing so well in the panhandle, and Giuliani not necessarily bleeding votes? It’s not out of the question that any one of the four could have won, under those fantasy circumstances. I take it as given that, on Super Tuesday, Huckabee wouldn’t have won much more--perhaps Missouri and Oklahoma. But Romney would have done better, and Giuliani might have hurt Mac in the Northeast.

My fantasy bottom line: by endorsing Huckabee earlier, Dobson could have made it more likely that someone he could tolerate--Huckabee or Romney--would be well-positioned after Super Tuesday. I don’t say this because I think that Dobson is a king-maker. His endorsement matters at the electoral margins and probably looms a bit larger in fund-raising. But that might have been enough to change the dynamics of a closely fought race.

Again, I say this as someone who will vote for McCain and would have voted for Romney or Huckabee.

Discussions - 6 Comments

The only reason to do this that I can think of is that Dobson wants absolutely no doubts anywhere that he does not like McCain. He dislikes McCain more than he likes any candidate at all.

I tend to agree with Ed. The more gracious response out of Dr. Dobson would have been dignified silence. His endorsing Huckabee now is meant to send some kind of message. Exactly what we can't know unless he tells us. But Ed's point is probably spot-on.

Dobson isn't a very bright guy. How 'bout that for an explanation?

It seems that some serious minded Catholics are deciding to go with Huckabee also, regardless of the Washington chatter.


http://www.catholic.org/national/national_story.php?id=26797

Well, it seems clear that Dobson has a tin ear for politics, since all this does is ensure that he'll be out of the conversation when it comes to November, especially since Huck doesn't seem to have problems with McCain and will no doubt be quite supportive in the fall. I have my doubts as to whether this sort of endorsement, done earlier, would have made much difference in any case. Huckabee made himself very much out to be *the* candidate of the religious right and it's hard to see why anyone who would be influenced by Dobson wouldn't have already voted for Huck.

Dr Dobson seems determined to encourage a Democrat victory. In the wake of it, of course, he will blame McCain.

Leave a Comment

* denotes a required field
 

No TrackBacks
TrackBack URL: http://nlt.ashbrook.org/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/11910